Last night, President Obama gave ABC’s George Stephanopolous his first interview since the Massachusetts special election. Admitting that people were “frustrated” with the results of his administration’s first year, Obama continued:
So the reason I say that we are not surprised by what happened in Massachusetts is because I’m frustrated, too.
I’m frustrated by the fact that over the last decade, we have not seen the kind of progress for middle class families that are needed. That’s what I promised to deliver in the campaign.
It’s not something that I believe we can get done in a year. But it is something that I think we are starting to make progress on.
The part of that statement I’ve highlighted should bring a groan from everyone who’s tired of Obama endlessly blaming his failures on his predecessor. Later in the interview, the President spoke of the “broader context” in which he plans to “move the middle class forward.” I don’t think he sees the context broadly enough. The middle class can trace its frustration much further back than the election of George Bush, or Bill Clinton before him.
The middle class is the great enemy of collectivist politics, under any of its names: progressivism, communism, fascism, or “liberalism.” As far back as Karl Marx, the apostles of collectivism have understood that they must subjugate the middle class before they can claim total victory.
The upper class isn’t a big problem – they don’t have the votes to block a collectivist agenda in a democracy, and they generally find ways to maintain, or increase, their power and wealth under a total State. The power of the State can be extremely valuable to them, for manipulating markets and thwarting upstart competitors. Many of them are willing to trade a little wealth for power, or find moral nourishment in supporting a collective agenda.
The members of the lower class are generally seen as the clients of a collectivist movement, the recipients of the social benefits it promises. Their desperation and anger become fuel for the movement, providing both righteousness and voting power. The collectivist only needs to conceal any hope of finding prosperity beyond the generosity of the State, and keep the lower class convinced that government is the only moral actor in the economy. Review the speeches of Barack Obama, and search for anything that suggests the poor should look anywhere beyond the government and its social programs for salvation.
It’s clear that the middle class is the great enemy of collectivism. Only they have the combination of voting power, money, and economic self-interest to see the growth of government as undesirable, and provide effective resistance. They generally view their interactions with government in a negative light – they’ve all spent time in the Department of Motor Vehicles mausoleum, spent hours wrestling with tax forms, or been slapped with a traffic citation they don’t think they deserved. They understand the inefficiency and emotional instability of government, and instinctively resent its intrusion into their lives. A health-care takeover is the best chance collectivists will ever have of persuading the middle class to vote itself into chains… but for the better part of a century, they’ve been able to hear the hammers of the State ringing on the metal of those chains, in the forges of taxation and regulation.
The middle class is a vast group in a capitalist society, which is one of the things collectivists really hate about capitalism. Its upper reaches include the entrepreneurs and small business owners that bring economic vitality. Virtually every aspect of Obama’s agenda is designed to injure or burden small businessmen, and this is no accident. Despite their angry rhetoric about giant corporations, leftists have little trouble controlling them. They often do business directly with the government, as vendors… and, through lobbyists, as customers. They generally employ members of labor unions, which serve as a de facto arm of Big Government, injecting the agenda of the State directly into the corporate bloodstream. It’s the small business owners and self-employed, along with those who aspire to join their ranks, who are the most difficult to control, and the most likely to muster effective electoral resistance to the statist agenda. The middle class is filled with people who pay attention to the second page of their paycheck stubs.
I realize all of the above sounds terribly sinister… and perhaps you find that appropriate, having reviewed the works of Saul Alinsky and the Cloward-Piven strategy of manufactured crisis. I believe it is crucial to understand that it doesn’t matter if the people engineering a collectivist state have sinister motives or not. In fact, the belief that their intentions make a difference is incredibly dangerous. It’s related to the catechism of the faculty-lounge Marxist, which holds that communism and fascism only failed because bad people were in charge of them. In his interview last night, the President gave this as his reason for pushing so forcefully for his health-care takeover plan:
The reason I tackled healthcare wasn’t because this was my personal hobbyhorse. The reason I tackled it was during the course of the campaign, I traveled all across this country and I kept on hearing heart-breaking stories about families who were bankrupt because they got sick. If they had health insurance, suddenly insurance companies were doing things that were just plain wrong, and were leaving folks in an extremely vulnerable position.
It doesn’t matter if this is his sincere belief, spoken straight from the heart. His health-care plan was still an awful idea that united the country in opposition against the increasingly thuggish and arrogant methods he used to advance it. Those methods are integral to the collectivist enterprise. It will always become thuggish and arrogant, because when all virtue resides in the State, those who oppose the growth of the State become villains by definition. Consider the President’s assessment of his Republican opponents:
My hope was a year ago today when I was being sworn in that reversing that process was going to be easier partly because we were entering into a crisis situation and I thought that the urgency of the moment would allow us to join together and make common cause. That hasn’t happened. Some of it, frankly, is I think a strategic decision that was made on the side of the opposition that… I think that some of it had to do with a sense that the best political strategy was to simply say no.
Here, in a nutshell, is the heads-we-win, tails-you-lose mentality that keeps the State plodding blindly forward, crushing a formerly vibrant economy beneath it. If you don’t answer Obama’s trillion-dollar health-care plan with your own trillion-dollar program, you’re an obstructionist – not an opponent to be debated, but an obstacle to be swept aside. The middle class is frustrated because they understand the basic concept of fiscal responsibility, and they know they – and their children – will be expected to pay for these titanic solutions.
They also know they’ll have very little to say about how the money is spent, because they don’t have the lobbying power of the core Democrat constituencies. They certainly won’t be “controlling” Big Government through their votes. It took a political apocalypse, triggered by an incredible Republican win in Massachusetts, to frighten the Democrats out of ramming their health care plan down America’s throat. How many times can the middle class, composed of individuals trying to live their lives and take care of their families, expect to generate such a powerful shock wave? In the collectivist future, those individuals won’t be waging epic battles to preserve their liberties. They’ll be haggling over percentage increases in their benefits.
The frustration of the middle class is the angry confusion of people who can appreciate the opportunities Big Government denies them. It is the anxiety of those who hear the businesses who employ them relentlessly demonized, while the ruling class is never held responsible for its foolishness, waste, and theft. It is the resentment of people who suffer through disasters that President Obama and his allies regard as opportunities. It’s the hearty distrust of a State, and its media apparatus, that declares every frigid blast of bad economic news to be “unexpected” – but expects us to believe it can predict market fluctuations, technological advances, and even the global climate.
The President says “I have every interest in seeing a unified country solving big problems.” The rest of us have an interest in being allowed to pursue our individual solutions to those problems, according to the liberties our Constitution says belong to us as absolutely as our souls. We can see the wreckage of those “unified” solutions strewn through our past, and littering the rest of the world. Our frustration is born of intelligence and moral strength, not stubborn blindness.
Cross-posted at Hot Air.
Thank you, Dr. Z, for your comments here. My favorite line was “It’s the hearty distrust of a State, and its media apparatus, that declares every frigid blast of bad economic news to be “unexpected” – but expects us to believe it can predict market fluctuations, technological advances, and even the global climate.”
Solid A+
Doc, There you go again. You are amazing. Ditto Ace. Only wish we could get The One to read this, although I fear he wouldn’t get it. Your #1 fan, Patti
Excellent article. The middle class of America definitely has a bulls eye on its back. The very back that supports the majority of big government. Detroit and California come to mind as perfect examples of government with a heart.
Middle-Class (aka taxpayer) Frustration: We are paying them to do this to us.
Excellent article, wish you could help Gov. Bob McDonnell with the response to the State of the Union address.
Eloquent as always, Doc. And, as always, I have a small bit of contention to add for consideration:
When you define “middle class,” what would the base salary be? How would you define this “mass” of those that are “middle class” in America? According to demographic statistics taken between 2002 and 2005 (before the bottom fell out, economically speaking), the middle class (earning more than $35k/year) only comprises approximately 44% of our population. The working/underclass is the clear majority at 55%. Since the current poverty line is around $25k, even those in the lower-middle class are dangerously close. Couple with that the fact that 75.4% of people in this country (in 2005) made less than $50k/year, even the middle-middle class could not afford any sort of tragedy.
I’d love to see some updated statistics for the current economic state; I imagine that many would agree that something needs to be done, beyond the “self-correcting” systems you espouse.
@DOne:
According to the Census Bureau, the median household income in 2005 was $44,389. Since the definition of the median is the point at which precisely half of the values are above and half below, it is impossible that 55% of households made less than $35000/yr, or that 75.4% made less than $50000/yr, in 2005. Regarding more current statistics, the Department of Health and Human Services estimates that median income for households from 1 Oct 08 to 30 Sep 09 was $70,354 (www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ocs/liheap/guidance/SMI75FY09.pdf).
Reading deeper into the Census Bureau statistics, one interesting datum is that the lowest quintile (20%) of households by income in 2005 had a median number of incomes (i.e., wage earners) of zero. That means that for 20% of the population (probably more, since lower-income households tend to be larger than higher-income households), the other 80% are already “doing” everything.
when i grew up, mom and pops instilled in me the golden rule, ‘do unto others…’ my rights ended where the others’ began. when exactly did the ‘others’ begin to take mine? i don’t know, but it is definitely sanctioned by this regime in office.
Losing Rights is certainly “one thing”. Losing your job is certainly another. Losing money by the trillions, yet another. But, when I see the security of my country being mismanaged to the point where attacks become weekly and “inevitable”; that’s where I draw the line. This President and his entire administration have one agenda and it DOES NOT include “to protect and defend” this Nation or it’s Constitution. It will do us no good to create even a Socialist society if there’s no America in which to exact it!
One more act of terrorism on American soil and this President’s head will be on the chopping block.
Perfect. I have read it 3 times and I wouldn’t change a word. I will be sharing it with my friends.
As most realize, the middle class and independents are the core group to whom each party appeals in hopes of election. As it’s a given that either the left or right will vote for their respective party. Upsetting that core middle group is a guaranteed way to either stay out of power or lose incumbency. Statistically, this past summer the democrats reached the point where their actions hit the ‘tipping point’ in alienating the middle class independents.
The rest is just history yet to be made.
Over the next 9 months we shall watch the democrats tear themselves apart. The leadership is primarily semi-radical leftists, yet alone they cannot accomplish any legislative goals without the moderate democrats. Who now see clearly the undeniable political guillotine that awaits them if they vote for partisan legislation.
Yet the leftist/progressives will not vote for a moderate agenda, thus political gridlock shall ensue and the voters will get angrier and angrier.
“If you lose Massachusetts and that’s not a wake-up call, there’s no hope of waking up” Sen. Evan Bayh (D-IN)
Stick a fork in them, they’re done and the ‘moderates’ know it. The Bayh’s are yelling, “there’s a cliff ahead!” and the leadership is yelling, “stay the course!”
Einstein put it nicely, “Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”
A lot of us have been saying for years that progressives are ‘unsane’, now they’re proving it.
As posted on my FB-Wall and at the local TEA Party FB-Group page, of which I am Co-Admin:
“Wow. Again and yet again, Dr. Zero provides the greatest wisdom. It remains for the rest of us only to heed his words…
R.A.P. — Read… Absorb… Pass it on…”
“May God watch over those who keep the watch for us.”
Doc Z, please know that I count you as one of our finest, keeping watch o’er the ramparts against those who would do harm to our Lives, our Liberties, and our Pursuit of Happiness.
[...] the rest here. Posted in Politics | No Comments » Leave a [...]
As a small businessman and a member of the great middle class unwashed, I realized early on that my representatives were ignoring my pleas for fiscal sanity this past year.
My decision (obviously like many others) was to bleed the bastards dry while I still had money left. Starting with the congressional race in New York, and, in particular in the Senate race in Massachusetts I contributed money to the opposition to the incumbent. I looked at it as a means of paying now instead of paying later.
And…it looks like I am not alone in my method of madness.
Good. If the incumbancy loses, so much the better, but if not, then I and others will make them commit resources until they have no resources left or I lose.
This is the recourse of middle class frustration, and make no doubt about it…this battle has just started.
Love it, Doctor Z. I just posted it at our site. I’ve long been a fan of yours (“No Doctor Zero, No Peace”) – thank you so much.
You’re welcome to slum with us anytime at C2. : )
There is one drawback of the Alinsky plan of a “manufactured crisis” it can ultimately backfire as our system of government is in a state of constant flux. Communists took power in countries through revolutions that were ineffectual monarchies or corrupt dictatorships where the populace had no means of changing things.
We on the other hand have the vote, when Obama starts to use his radical plans to collapse the economic system and things get worse. All after campaigning how he was the “messiah of hope and change” and things were going to get better. The middle class gets impatient, as a fesult we have the tea parties and Scott Brown winning Ted kennedy’s seat.
This is ironic a community organizer, who organized grass roots and linked to professional activists gets his pet health care project killed by the same thing.
There was a difference between the Tea Parties than Code Pink or these other anti-war groups that sprung up over Bush’s War in Iraq.
The Tea Parties were effective, because they worked to get results and followed a tactical strategy of hitting their opposition in its weak-points. The Tea Parties conducted a strategic military campaign to take down Obama Care.
Code Pink and the ilk are all about getting attention through public stunts such as Camping out in front of Bush’s ranch, interrupting Senate hearings harassing troops at Walter Reed. Does it get any results, no. In turn it actual hurts them. But they do not care because they do it feel “positive.” Positivity is a HUGE manta of the left, doit to feel warm with good happy thoughts of change, even though your actions are not going to do jack to bring out any change whatsoever.