Archive for “Politics”

After The Fall

Friday, September 3, 2010

The November elections may well be the most historic reversal of political power in modern history.  Sean Trende at Real Clear Politics thinks over 60 seats in the House could go Republican.  Dick Morris is ready to toss another 20 seats into the ante.  A more restrained estimate in the high 40s comes from Larry Sabato, who also reminds us the Senate almost always switches parties when the House does.

The usual caveats apply: campaigns will stumble, local issues will come into play, unforeseen events could change the minds of jittery voters, and skeletons have a habit of tumbling from closets around Halloween.  Still, it seems very likely the GOP will at least take the House.  Thanks to the Tea Party influence, some old RINOs will also be replaced by tough new war elephants.

What then?

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

The Honor of a Great People

Sunday, August 29, 2010

Three hundred thousand people gathered in the Washington Mall on August 28, at the invitation of radio and TV host Glenn Beck, to discuss restoring the honor of the American people.  How did a great people come to lose their honor?

It certainly hasn’t been lost by all of us.  Individuals, families, and communities across America never broke faith with the noble traditions of self-reliance, responsibility, and adventure that forged this honorable nation.  Such people can be found in every neighborhood of every city… but the nation as a whole has lost its way.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Equality Before The Law

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

The Washington Post brings us news of an Obama Administration report to the United Nations, confessing our “less than perfect” human rights record:

In its first-ever report to the U.N. Human Rights Council on conditions in the United States, the State Department said Monday that some Americans, notably minorities, are still victims of discrimination. Despite success in reforming such inequities as slavery and the denial of women’s right to vote, the department said, considerable progress is still needed.

Those “successes in reforming the inequities of slavery and the denial of women’s right to vote” occurred 145 and 90 years ago, respectively.  Obama Administration functionaries must have a highly refined disdain for their own country, in order to bring them up as a way of giving a little pat on the head to an ugly, backwards nation.  There hasn’t been much progress on human rights in America since we passed the Nineteenth Amendment, but thank heavens Barack Obama is finally on the case!  He inherited the throne of a miserable country, but perhaps his enlightened leadership can work us up to a solid B+.

The Administration report lists the daunting issues it must overcome to reach the human-rights plateau occupied by China, Saudi Arabia, Libya, and the other deeply concerned members of the U.N. Human Rights Council:

High unemployment rates, hate crime, poverty, poor housing, lack of access to health care and discriminatory hiring practices are among the challenges the report identified as affecting blacks, Latinos, Muslims, South Asians, Native Americans and gays and lesbians in the United States.

As DrewM at Ace of Spades notes, none of these things are “human rights violations.”  The nature of the real violation is implied: resistance to the progressive agenda that will supposedly eliminate these unpleasant realities of life.  The essential absurdity of multiculturalism is the need to drag America down until it can be treated as equal to the thug states infesting the United Nations.  That’s how we end up with the Obama Administration moaning about “lack of access to health care” as a human rights violation, in a report submitted to a council that includes Saudi Arabia, where a court has ruled that a man’s spinal cord can be severed as punishment.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

The Destiny of a Free Nation

Thursday, August 12, 2010

In the comments to The Dominion of Liars, itzWicks asks:

The refrain that I hear over and over again at the conclusion of excellent essays such as this (as well as from the well articulated comments that follow on this blog) is sadly the same: “What are we going to do about it? What can be done now?”

That’s a great question.  It’s easy to react, analyze, and criticize.  It’s natural for a writer to spend much of his time doing so, when the philosophy he opposes holds all the power, and makes all the news.  Today’s current events are largely created by the Left.

I write essays like “The Dominion of Liars” because I believe every opportunity should be taken to present the case that statism is fundamentally flawed, from its mistaken premises to its corrupt conclusions.  It’s important to couple that prosecution with testimony about the power and virtue of freedom, along with a fair accounting of its dangers.

The scale of the challenge facing us is formidable.  Like all fearsome things, it is also exhilarating.  In the blood and bile of this dying statist economy, we can see the desperate future of an indentured nation… a truth many of us have refused to see, when displayed in bankrupt socialism around the world.  What is the destiny of a free nation?

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

The Dominion of Liars

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Even some of President Obama’s supporters are beginning to grumble about what a terrible liar he is.  He lies incessantly, often with a clumsy “as I have always said” introduction that seems positively delusional in the Google era.  He seems determined to set a new record for broken campaign promises, against stiff competition from politicians of both parties.  Veracity is a sliding scale for politicians, but Obama’s entire government tips that scale onto its side.

Broken promises are a fact of political life.  There are relatively honorable reasons for some of them: a politician might change his mind because of new information, or find himself forced to compromise an unattainable goal.  Deals and compromises are the meat and drink set at every political table.  It’s not always bad when they change their minds.  America is fortunate that Obama abandoned some of his most foolish promises to the Angry Left after his first national security briefings.

Even with the above qualifications, this is an exceptionally dishonest Presidency.  If the public desires greater honesty, it must ensure the next chief executive presides over a dramatically smaller government.  A large State will always degenerate into a dominion of liars.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

The Shape of Things to Come

Friday, July 30, 2010

The past few days have brought a number of developments which illuminate the future our ruling party has planned for us.  Consider the outlines of this rapidly approaching future when you decide how vigorously you wish to oppose it, or whether you’ll allow a general sense of disgust and weariness to keep you away from the polls in the next few elections.

Our course will be charted by an increasingly powerful, corrupt, and insulated ruling class.  There will be more Charlie Rangels, not less.  In fact, the current Charlie Rangel might still be there.  The centralization of government puts a vast amount of valuable power in the hands of career politicians.  The longer their careers, the more power they accumulate.  ”Safe seats” provide a mechanism for long-term incumbency, and insulate elder statesmen from electoral consequences.  Loyal constituencies and high-voltage ideology, such as Rangel’s attempt to transform his corruption hearings into a racially-charged “lynching,” give them far more ways to evade accountability than any private-sector executive.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

The Independent Question

Friday, July 23, 2010

We’re getting close to a major congressional election, and the early maneuvers of the 2012 presidential race are under way.  That means it’s time to worry about independent voters again.

Independents are the battleground where national elections are fought.  The winning formula involves some combination of motivating the party base, suppressing the other party’s base, and gaining support from independent voters.  The tactics necessary to succeed at any one of these things makes the others more difficult.  Appeal to the “middle” too much and your base grows restless, and eventually disgusted enough to stay home on Election Day.  Play to your base and you make independents nervous, along with firing up the other side’s core supporters.

Insufficient appeal to independent voters is often cited as the fatal flaw in candidates beloved by the conservative base.  (It never seems to be a problem for liberal candidates from the Democrat Party, who are never described in the media as “extremists” who “frighten away moderates.”)  No brand of conventional wisdom is received as eagerly as the diagnosis of conservative extremism.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

The Business of Government

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

The original mission statement of NASA reads as follows: “To improve life here, to extend life to there, to find life beyond.”  The part about improving life here turns out to be a kind of cosmic Interstate Commerce Clause, justifying any conceivable activity… including “expanding our international relationships” and “reaching out to the Muslim world,” which NASA administrator Charles Bolden sees as “perhaps foremost.”

This news comes as the latest extension of unemployment benefits looks to be failing in Congress.  Saul Relative of Yahoo’s Associated Content reports the news this way:

As both parties squared off and began blaming each other for the failure of the bill to pass, Senator Kent Conrad (R-ND) told the Washington Post that: “People are in the mood of letting the dust settle before finding the next step.”

“People” apparently refer to the senators, mostly powerful and connected millionaires who aren’t hanging on to their lives via a weekly unemployment benefits check, because the “people” the benefits extension was meant to help were again placed in the limbo of uncertainty, of continued joblessness, and, due to the Senate’s inability to agree on legislation, no income. The “settle” part of Conrad’s comment referred to shelving the bill until after the Senate returns from its July 4 recess, which occurs on July 14.

The Republicans – as far back as brave, lonely Senator Jim Bunning – have been insisting the Democrats honor their “PayGo” commitment, and cut spending elsewhere to fund these unemployment extensions.  The official position of the Democrat Party is that not one single dime of our massive, deficit-riddled budget can be sacrificed.  Every dollar, plus hundreds of billions more, is vitally needed.  This includes the $18 billion poured into a space agency that no longer explores space.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

The Virtual Government

Monday, July 5, 2010

On the most urgent matters facing the United States at the moment – including the economy, the Gulf oil spill, border security, and foreign policy – Obama and the Democrat Party have almost completely given up on addressing the actual crises.  They invest all of their energy in media manipulation and spin control.

This has produced some absolutely surreal moments, from Pete Stark raving about secure borders, to Nancy Pelosi smashing her frozen grin through the Broken Windows Fallacy, showering her audience with the bloody glass of pure ignorance.  President Obama has made plenty of contributions along these lines, most recently with the weird assertion that a shrinking workforce is actually good employment news.  The President’s followers pitched in with a delusional effort to declare him one of the greatest chief executives ever.

Meanwhile, the only thing Obama sees in the Gulf is the layer of media coverage floating on top of the oil slick.  He looks excited and engaged when dealing with the political dimensions of the problem – restricting media access, demonizing the private sector, giving speeches about how much he cares.  The actual oil spill leaves him completely paralyzed.  In fact, he seems honestly puzzled that anyone expects him to do anything except restrict media access, demonize the private sector, and give speeches about how much he cares.  The closest thing to a “solution” in his rhetoric involves Americans getting used to living with a more primitive economy that consumes less fossil fuel, while forking over more money for imaginary “green” jobs, so the ruling class can pretend it has achieved a state of high-tech harmony with nature.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Night of the Yeoman

Thursday, June 24, 2010

There are two Republican parties, and both had a candidate on the 2008 presidential ticket.  John McCain was the candidate of the thin-blooded aristocracy, tired men who dislike certain elements of their nominal constituency far more intensely than their political opposition.  They have no strenuous objection to the premises of the Left, as could be seen from McCain’s swift acceptance of the freedom-has-failed spin pushed by the Democrats during the 2008 financial crisis.  Many of them believe opposition to the Left’s emotional narrative is electoral suicide.  This also makes them reluctant to criticize Democrat candidates in harsh terms… which they have no reluctance to deploy against conservative primary opponents.  They might speak up against its worst excesses, but they have no serious argument with the basic concept of Big Government – remember “National Greatness Conservatism?”  They offer themselves as wiser, perhaps slightly more frugal drivers of the vast federal sandworm.  They invest great effort in cultivating relationships with the dinosaur media, which they perceive as an irresistible force dominating American politics.  They always look honestly surprised when these relationships disintegrate at crucial moments during national campaigns.

The other Republican party is young and vital.  On the 2008 ticket, its banner was carried by Sarah Palin.  It’s the yeoman wing of the party, composed of people with middle-class backgrounds and real-world business experience.  These people are appalled at the bloated mess in Washington, and the smaller but equally fatal tumors infecting many state capitols.  They see a government speeding toward systemic collapse, its doom spelled out in the simple math of unsustainable entitlements and economy-crushing taxation.  They’re in love with the American people, a sincere passion that rings from every speech Palin delivers.  Their idealism and energy leads them to stumble occasionally, and some veteran political operatives of the old Republican gentry are eager to give them a firm shove from behind.  They correctly view the dinosaur media as an implacable opponent, and sometimes waste energy complaining about it… but the evolution of Palin’s media presence demonstrates they are learning to control the media, instead of fighting it.

The yeoman wing of the Republican Party had a very good night on Tuesday.  Nikki Haley strode with dignity across the puddle of sleaze leaking from the old party machine in South Carolina, with Tim Scott right beside her, while long-term incumbent Bob Inglis was annihilated by movement conservative Trey Gowdy.  Mike Lee won a much narrower, but still significant, victory in Utah.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark